<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UCSB Graduate Student Association</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ucsbgsa.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ucsbgsa.org</link>
	<description>Voice of UCSB Graduate Students</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 20:35:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mail Delivery Continues at West Campus Family Housing</title>
		<link>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/05/mail-delivery-continues-at-west-campus-family-housing/</link>
		<comments>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/05/mail-delivery-continues-at-west-campus-family-housing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 20:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GSAAcademic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ucsbgsa.org/?p=673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fantastic news from Billy Jankowski: Hello folks, I received word that the local postmaster has fully and officially rescinded the decision for USPS to stop mail delivery.  At this point, there will be no change in services on June 1st, nor at any date in the future as far as we know.  We expect this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic news from Billy Jankowski:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" title="UCSB Apartment and Community Living" src="http://www.housing.ucsb.edu/home/home-images/homban-top.gif" alt="" width="750" height="25" /></p>
<p>Hello folks,</p>
<p>I received word that the local postmaster has fully  and officially rescinded the decision for USPS to stop mail delivery.  At  this point, there will be no change in services on June 1<sup>st</sup>, nor  at any date in the future as far as we know.  We expect this issue to be fully closed.  Please feel free to spread the word.</p>
<p>I want you to know that I deeply appreciate all the  efforts you took on such short notice to get our residents notified and  involved.</p>
<p>If you have any questions or concerns, please don’t  hesitate to contact me.</p>
<p>Have a great long weekend!</p>
<p>Billy</p>
<p>Billy Jankowski</p>
<p>Assistant Director, Apartment Student Programs</p>
<p>Apartment &amp; Community Living</p>
<p>University of California, Santa Barbara</p>
<p>805-893-5831</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/05/mail-delivery-continues-at-west-campus-family-housing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 GSA Excellence in Teaching Awards</title>
		<link>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/05/2010-gsa-excellence-in-teaching-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/05/2010-gsa-excellence-in-teaching-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 19:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GSAAcademic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ucsbgsa.org/?p=660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Graduate Student Association congratulates James O&#8217;Dea, Lily Wong, Mario Guerrero, and Brian Janssen as this year&#8217;s GSA Excellence in Teaching Award recipients.  The selection committee would like to acknowledge all nominees for the outstanding service they provide to undergraduate education here at UCSB.  To learn more about the recipients of this award, head over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ucsbgsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Congrats.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-661" title="Congrats" src="http://ucsbgsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Congrats.png" alt="" width="488" height="193" /></a></p>
<p>The Graduate Student Association congratulates James O&#8217;Dea, Lily Wong, Mario Guerrero, and Brian Janssen as this year&#8217;s GSA Excellence in Teaching Award recipients.  The selection committee would like to acknowledge all nominees for the outstanding service they provide to undergraduate education here at UCSB.  To learn more about the recipients of this award, head over to <a href="http://ucsbgsa.org/awards " target="_blank">http://ucsbgsa.org/awards </a></p>
<p>Award recipients will be honored at our last GSA Assembly meeting scheduled for Tuesday June 1st at 6:00pm in the GSA Lounge.  Please attend to celebrate their success!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/05/2010-gsa-excellence-in-teaching-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPS decides to stop delivering mail to West Campus Family Housing</title>
		<link>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/05/usps-decides-to-stop-delivering-mail-to-west-campus-family-housing/</link>
		<comments>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/05/usps-decides-to-stop-delivering-mail-to-west-campus-family-housing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 18:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GSAAcademic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ucsbgsa.org/?p=654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, the USPS informed the university that they are classifying the West Campus Family Housing units as dormitories, and will no longer deliver mail to these residence.  Effective June 1st, all mail for West Campus Family Housing will be delivered to the University. With rumors that Storke is next in line for a withdrawal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" title="USPS" src="http://www.usps.com/common/images/v2header/usps_hm_ci_logo2-159x36x8.gif" alt="" width="159" height="36" />Last week, the USPS informed the university that they are classifying the West Campus Family Housing units as dormitories, and will no longer deliver mail to these residence.  Effective June 1st, all mail for West Campus Family Housing will be delivered to the University.</p>
<p>With rumors that Storke is next in line for a withdrawal of USPS mail services, we ask all graduate students to participate in the fight to stop the USPS from withdrawing services to our communities.  Here&#8217;s a link to the flyer with additional details.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>UPDATE:</strong></span></p>
<p>Great news!  The USPS has retracted their letter to the university stating their intent to stop mail services to West Campus Family Housing on June 1st.  Hopefully we have won the war, and not just a single battle.</p>
<p>If the USPS intends to stop delivery of mail at a later date, the university has a plan to maintain services to our communities while the legal team continues to fight to maintain mail services if that becomes necessary.</p>
<p>UCSB Housing and the Graduate Student Association will continue to keep you informed as information becomes available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/05/usps-decides-to-stop-delivering-mail-to-west-campus-family-housing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Official Decision on GSHIP for 2010-11</title>
		<link>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/05/official-decision-on-gship-for-2010-11/</link>
		<comments>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/05/official-decision-on-gship-for-2010-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 18:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VPStudent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ucsbgsa.org/?p=647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Elizabeth Downing, Director of Student Health, would like to share the following message about our 2010-11 GSHIP plan with the graduate student community: &#8220;After very careful consideration on the part of many parties here at UCSB, it has been decided that we will opt out of participation in the new systemwide GSHIP for 10-11, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Elizabeth Downing, Director of Student Health, would like to share the following message about our 2010-11 GSHIP plan with the graduate student community:</p>
<p>&#8220;After very careful consideration on the part of many parties here at UCSB, it has been decided that we will opt out of participation in the new systemwide GSHIP for 10-11, continuing instead with our usual arrangement of the past 9 years with our insurance broker, Renaissance Agencies, and coverage this year, as in the past few years, with Nationwide Insurance Co.  This will include the usual, ongoing Eye Clinic and Dental Care Center operations in additional to the services routinely provided at Student Health.  The graduate students, in consultation with Student Health personnel, negotiated and approved an excellent plan with Nationwide for the coming year at a significantly reduced cost with additional benefits.  UCSB will plan on implementing the systemwide GSHIP for the school year 11-12 and we will keep you appraised throughout the upcoming year as to expectations and changes to come.  Thank you so much for your patience!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/05/official-decision-on-gship-for-2010-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Academic Senate Outstanding Teaching Assistant Awards</title>
		<link>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/04/2010-academic-senate-outstanding-teaching-assistant-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/04/2010-academic-senate-outstanding-teaching-assistant-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GSAAcademic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ucsbgsa.org/?p=630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tis the season to award graduate students for their outstanding teaching here at UCSB.  In a few short weeks, the Graduate Student Association will be awarding the GSA Excellence in Teaching Awards.  This year we had 32 nominees. At the last Faculty Legislature meeting held on Thursday April 22nd, four graduate students were presented with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tis the season to award graduate students for their outstanding teaching here at UCSB.  In a few short weeks, the Graduate Student Association will be awarding the GSA Excellence in Teaching Awards.  This year we had 32 nominees.</p>
<p>At the last Faculty Legislature meeting held on Thursday April 22nd, four graduate students were presented with the 2010 Academic Senate Outstanding Teaching Assistant Award.  <a title="Academic Senate Awards" href="https://senate.ucsb.edu/awards/2009.10/" target="_blank">https://senate.ucsb.edu/awards/2009.10/</a></p>
<p>Congratulations to our outstanding teaching assistants!</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Music Department:  Denise Gill</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Department of Molecular, Cellular, &amp; Developmental Biology:  Brian Janssen</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Department of English:  Joomi Kim</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Department of Film &amp; Media Studies:  Nicole Starosielski<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Denise Gill</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>For her exemplary work as a Teaching Assistant, we are pleased to announce that Denise Gill is a recipient of a 2010 <em>Outstanding Teaching Assistant Award</em>.  Denise is a Ph.D. candidate in the Music Department with a Feminist Studies Doctoral Emphasis.  She has served as both a Teaching Assistant as well as a Teaching Associate for classes in both departments, and she expects to receive her PhD this summer.</p>
<p>A professor of hers in the Music department comments that Denise is “the finest Teaching Assistant that I have had the pleasure of working with.” He notes that she is an “exceptionally creative and effective teacher” and that he has  “…personally learned much from her discussion techniques, the way she designs essay questions, and her ability to be both supportive and challenging with undergraduate students.”</p>
<p>One of her supporters notes, “The teaching evaluations that Denise has received demonstrate her excellence in the classroom and support of diverse students. In every evaluation category, she is ranked between Excellent and Very Good.”</p>
<p>Another writes that Denise “is positioned to be a truly interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary instructor as well as scholar. She is an enthusiastic and energetic instructor with a strong sense of how to bring together the important arguments in a field and the abilities of the students who face her.”</p>
<p>Finally, one of her students offers the following, “Denise always encouraged her students to think beyond the question and to never resort to ‘lazy thinking.’ … [S]he also urged us to delve deeply into subjects that we had never questioned and think critically not because we were supposed to, but because we were too intelligent not to. Looking back, I do not only feel fortunate that Denise was my teaching assistant, but that I had her during my first quarter in college.”</p>
<p>For her dedication to excellence in teaching, Denise Gill is awarded a 2010 <em>Outstanding Teaching Assistant Award</em>. Congratulations!</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Brian David Janssen</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Brian Janssen is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Molecular, Cellular, &amp; Developmental Biology, and is a recipient of this year’s <em>Outstanding Teaching Assistant Award</em>. Brian has advanced to candidacy in the PhD program and is close to finishing his thesis work.</p>
<p>His nominator writes of him,<strong> “</strong>He has worked to hone his teaching style, serves as an excellent sounding board and as a source for new ideas regarding course content and style, and works tirelessly to help the students in the class. He has mastered the skill of being approachable and helpful while maintaining the line between student and teacher – he has earned the respect of the students and challenges them to tap into their potentials<strong>”</strong></p>
<p>One of his faculty supporters who he works with as a TA in Developmental Biology states simply, “I have taught this course for 15 years – Brian Janssen is the best TA that has ever served with me in this lecture course.”</p>
<p>Students in one of his classes write, “His eagerness to teach was apparent and his enthusiasm for the subject material was contagious; he motivated us to attend his 8 AM sections on Fridays and participate in discussion.”  They continue with, “…Brian was the best TA we have had at UCSB. He went above and beyond what was required of him, and for his great attitude toward us and his concern for our education, it is a privilege to nominate him for this prestigious award.”</p>
<p>For his hard work and dedicated teaching Brian Janssen is awarded a 2010 <em>Outstanding Teaching Assistant Award</em>. Congratulations!</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Joomi Kim</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>For her exemplary work as a Teaching Assistant, we are pleased to announce that Joomi Kim is a recipient of a 2010 <em>Outstanding Teaching Assistant Award</em>. Ms. Kim is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of English, where she has been a graduate student since 2001. She notes that as an undergraduate student in South Korea, she never had a Teaching Assistant for any of her classes, and “that being a Teaching Assistant was initially a voice-trembling experience.”  Despite this, a professor of Asian American Studies notes that she “has consistently rated among the best TAs in [the] department.”  He continues, stating, “Because she has been such an excellent teaching assistant throughout her time at UCSB, she has never had any trouble finding a job in our department, or in the English Department, or in the Writing Program. She is quite clearly an excellent, gifted teacher.”</p>
<p>One of her supporters notes, “[H]er students consistently praise her ability to help them with difficult concepts, and more than a few have described her discussion section as a ‘pleasure’ to attend, and ‘fun,’ too.”</p>
<p>Another faculty nominator states, “I know Ms. Kim … to be a thoughtful and caring instructor, and a true advocate for her students, unstinting in the time and energies she devotes to their learning.” And continues, noting “Ms. Kim is kind enough to over-enroll students in each section, to mitigate the shortage in available spaces, this means not 46 but up to 72 pieces of student prose to correct each week. Yet she handwrites comments on each of her students’ many homework assignments …a notoriously intricate task in literary criticism.”</p>
<p>Finally, a former student of her Asian American literature class offers the following: “As a math major I mainly take math and science classes. I had some interest in the subject but mostly took this class to fulfill general education requirements. I started out mildly interested in the class, but by the end I was completely engrossed in it, and this is mostly due to Joomi…. Joomi wanted us to succeed in the course, and she did as much as she possibly could to help us…. To put it simply, Joomi Kim is one of the best teachers I have ever had.”</p>
<p>For her hard work and excellence in teaching, Joomi Kim is awarded a 2010 <em>Outstanding Teaching Assistant Award</em>. Congratulations, Ms. Kim!<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Nicole Starosielski</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>For her exemplary work as a Teaching Assistant, we are pleased to announce that Nicole Starosielski is a recipient of a 2010 <em>Outstanding Teaching Assistant Award</em>. Nicole is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Film &amp; Media Studies, where she has been a graduate student since 2005. She is also pursuing certificates in Technology &amp; Society and Global Studies and is scheduled to defend her dissertation this summer.</p>
<p>The chair of her department (as well as her dissertation committee) writes that she has “utterly excelled in the areas of teaching, research, and professional participation.”  Another faculty member describes her as “a tremendously talented, intelligent, creative, generous, and enthusiastic young scholar.” Furthermore, she adds, “It is not adequate to say that Nicole is in the top 1% of teaching assistants I have had or come across in my career—she is the best.”</p>
<p>One of her students praises Nicole for her mentorship as a TA. The student describes how Nicole appointed her to head a project, and then spent months working with her to have it realized.  She states, “While Nicole allowed us to experiment and learn independently, she successfully served as a creative guide for our group to create a film that we were proud of. Her intellect and tireless effort to really do something unique and important in our department and the community, was very apparent to me from the beginning.”</p>
<p>She is noted for helping students “to think critically and independently.… She does not merely lecture or talk ‘at’ us like many. Instead, she works out ideas with us.”</p>
<p>Finally, one student comments, “In Nicole’s classes, I feel like my brain is really working, not just listening and taking in information, but actually exercising, searching, struggling, and growing.”</p>
<p>For her hard work and dedicated teaching Nicole Starosielski is awarded a 2010 <em>Outstanding Teaching Assistant Award</em>. Congratulations!</p>
<p><!-- P { 	MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px } BODY { 	SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #3f52b8; SCROLLBAR-DARKSHADOW-COLOR: #fafafa; SCROLLBAR-BASE-COLOR: #f7f7f7; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #cecfce; SCROLLBAR-TRACK-COLOR: #fffbff } SPAN#misspelled { 	PADDING-BOTTOM: 1px; BACKGROUND: url(8.1.263.0/themes/base/squiggly.gif) repeat-x 50% bottom } --></p>
<div><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: x-small;"></p>
<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: tahoma; font-size: x-small;">Indy Hurt</span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: tahoma; font-size: x-small;">UCSB Department of Geography, PhD  Student</span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: tahoma; font-size: x-small;">Graduate Student Association Vice  President of Academic Affairs 2009/2010</span></div>
<p></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/04/2010-academic-senate-outstanding-teaching-assistant-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UC Commission on the Future &#8211; Funding Strategies Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/04/uc-commission-on-the-future-funding-strategies-reviewed/</link>
		<comments>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/04/uc-commission-on-the-future-funding-strategies-reviewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GSAAcademic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ucsbgsa.org/?p=616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first set of recommendations from the working groups of the UC Commission on the Future were released a few weeks ago, and several campus committees are reviewing the content.  This public 153 page document can be found on the UC Commission on the Future website:  http://ucfuture.universityofcalifornia.edu/ You can download the document directly from us [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first set of recommendations from the working groups of the UC Commission on the Future were released a few weeks ago, and several campus committees are reviewing the content.  This public 153 page document can be found on the UC Commission on the Future website:  <a title="UC Commission on the Future" href="http://ucfuture.universityofcalifornia.edu/" target="_blank">http://ucfuture.universityofcalifornia.edu/</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://ucsbgsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/UCCF_Header.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-619" title="UCCF Header" src="http://ucsbgsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/UCCF_Header.png" alt="UC Commission on the Future website header" width="691" height="90" /></a>You can download the document directly from us as well:  <a href="http://ucsbgsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/cotf_wg_first_recs.pdf" target="_blank">FirstRecommendations</a></p>
<p>I took a close look at the recommendations proposed by the Funding Strategies working group appearing on <strong>pages 73 to 106</strong>.  Here are my observations:</p>
<p>First I&#8217;ll say that I need to be reminded who the audience is for these  documents.  This factors in to the extent by which arguments must be  explained.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an interesting point on <strong>page 73</strong> (first bullet) about the  necessity of state funding to support the efforts of attracting outside  funding.  Perhaps this area needs both a louder voice with a better  explanation to garner support.  Obviously it takes world class faculty  and graduate students to compete for outside funding but retaining this  talent does not rest solely on the outside funding they are able to  obtain.  In order to attract and retain this talent, the state needs to  make efforts to restore funding.  Essentially, we need to get the talent  here before you can reap the benefit of their abilities to attract  outside funding.</p>
<p>First bullet, <strong>page 74</strong>:  What exactly is the endowment size of each  UC campus?  How has this money increased/decreased over time?  What have  been the factors contributing to the increase/decrease of UC  endowments?  This information would lend more support to any efforts to  compare our resources to the private institutions eluded to in this  section.  Of course, disclosing this information will lead to questions  about how the endowments are managed.</p>
<p>Regarding administrative efficiency principles in general:  A  reduction does not necessarily equate to an increase in efficiency.   With respect to staff, the work conducted by those who are laid off  falls on the backs of those who remain.  This puts strain on the  administrative infrastructure of our university system while doing  little to boost positive employee morale.  The university cannot operate  without the support of our hard working dedicated staff who are already  stretched thin.</p>
<p><strong>Page 75</strong>, the second bullet should include collecting data on  graduates.  How many stay in CA, contributing to the economy?  The  &#8220;campaign&#8221; should also draw upon historical voter trends with respect to  educational taxes.  Over the last few months, arguments have been  presented that votes are in support of education, but the details of  this support need to be highlighted to support the arguments.   Additionally, there is something to be learned about public opinion by  observing the comments left on news blogs that posted articles related  to the current state of our university system.</p>
<p><strong>Page 76</strong>, fourth bullet:  Yes, an advocacy campaign will absolutely  be costly no matter how you approach it.  Even time is money.  Perhaps  we can garner support from celebrity alumni and professional athletes  who got there start at a UC.  Surely there are many and their public  support has the ability to reach a very large audience.</p>
<p><strong>Page 77</strong>, challenges:  We really need some stats on the number of  graduates who stay in California to strengthen this argument.  Regarding  next steps for implementation, we have seen many grass roots  organizations spring up around the current issues associated with our  university system but it&#8217;s unclear how much effort went into providing  these organizations with accurate information.  It will be important in  the future to support these organizations with as much information as  possible.  Incorrect or misinterpreted information disseminating from  these organizations inadvertently weakens our efforts to collectively  advocate for reform.</p>
<p><strong>Page 78</strong>:  We need to vote to stop future cuts.  Additionally, we need  more information on a potential bill to cap fees:  <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9F1HPP80.htm" target="_blank">http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9F1HPP80.htm</a></p>
<div id=":6r">and do what we can to support it if it is something of benefit to the  university system.</p>
<p><strong>Page 79</strong>:  The last bullet addresses the prison funding vs education  funding debate.  In my opinion, this is an excellent argument that is  easy to understand and communicate to the general public comprised of  the tax payers we need to support us.</p>
<p><strong>Page 80</strong>:  As stated earlier, part of the current model cuts staff  and redistributes the work among remaining staff.  This practice is not  sustainable.</p>
<p><strong>Page 81</strong>:  Challenges:  We&#8217;ve established our  ability to generate reports, why haven&#8217;t prior recommendations been  implemented?  The answer to this question will give us an idea of the  level of success we can expect with the reports we are currently  generating.  Of course, we have to obtain some level of commitment to do  <em><strong>something</strong>.</em></p>
<p><strong>Page 84 &amp; 86</strong>:  Indirect cost recovery (ICR) is out of balance  with the true cost of research.  Obviously this is problematic, but what  are the implications of raising the rates the university charges?  Will  we become less competitive in our bids?  Will the resulting grants  cover fewer quarters of support for graduate students tasked to work on  these research projects?  An investment in resources will have to be  made to obtain a higher rate.  If we attempt to follow the model of  other universities that have established a &#8220;permanent government costing  group&#8221;, a definitive commitment of transparency would be absolutely  necessary for this to fly, particularly when the perception is already  characterized by the belief that faculty are not receiving a fair share  of the ICR.</p>
<p><strong>Page 88</strong>:  Drop the term &#8220;student fees&#8221; in favor of &#8220;tuition&#8221;.  I&#8217;m  in agreement with this recommendation but would still like to know if  there are any potential unintended consequences.  Who might be in  opposition of this change?</p>
<p><strong>Page 89</strong>:  What constitutes &#8220;low-income&#8221;?  &#8220;middle-class&#8221;?</p>
<p><strong>Page  92</strong>:  As the state continues to disinvest, non resident tuition will  become a more important line item in the budget of the UC.  Will a cap  be set or suggested for non resident students?  10%?  30% of the total  number of students?  Keep in mind that public support hinges on  accessibility, not just for low income students, but for all.  More and  more news articles are highlighting the highly selective admissions  process.  Highly qualified students are not getting admitted to their  campus of choice.  Any displacement that appears to be attributed to the  enrollment of non resident students will inevitably ignite a political  fire storm.  With public opinion cited as an important component of  garnering the support of tax payers expected to vote on state funded  education issues in the future, we cannot afford to alienate.  With this in  mind, perhaps Option 2 described on <strong>page 93</strong> in the Fiscal Implications  would be a better place to start should this funding recommendation  progress towards implementation.  In the mean time, we really need to  know the numbers.  How many non resident applicants do we currently  review?  How many are admitted as a percentage of the total?</p>
<p><strong>Page 98</strong>:  There&#8217;s a table suggesting that an increase in core funds  of roughly $100,500,000 would have been awarded in 2008/2009 to the UC  if the Pell Plus suggestion was in place based on a 70% graduation rate  of Pell Grant recipients.  Skipping over to the first paragraph on <strong>page  99</strong>, there is a statement about the amount of federal Pell Grant funding  expected to reach $68 billion in fiscal year 2011.  Requesting the Pell  Plus program equates to roughly 0.15% of the expected $68 billion.  This  seems quite reasonable, yet I am not familiar with what the specific  intended outcomes were for the dramatic increase in Pell Grant funding.   Obviously, the intention is to make college more accessible for a  larger percentage of the population, but I&#8217;m just not sure how  accessible those funds will be for something like the Pell Plus idea  regardless of it&#8217;s good intentions to support education.  Additionally,  take care to avoid unintended consequences like quotas for admission.   Also keep in mind that Pell Grant recipients often benefit from an added  network of support.  Support centers on campus have been downsizing  considerably due to budget cuts.</p>
<p><strong>Page 101</strong>:  This whole section just seems like a soft-money  nightmare.  I can&#8217;t advise on this section, but know that graduate  students are interested because many of us hope to join the ranks of our UC faculty.  I  think about that President&#8217;s Postdoc which was designed to provide FTE  opportunities within the UC for UC graduates.  The decisions made in  this area impact my decisions to apply.  I will point out that the  second bullet under Rationale / Existing precedent seems to contradict  efforts to balance ICR.  The challenges on <strong>page 102</strong> are compelling,  particularly with respect to equity issues.</p>
<p><strong>Page 103</strong>:  I&#8217;m against differential tuition for all of the same  reasons that have already been expressed.  The report seems to suggest  that there will not be an impact on student demand, but this can only  apply to students with money.  Arguably, even they will be impacted  because as the cost of a UC degree creeps closer to that of a private  institution, we lose a portion of our competitive edge to recruit the  brightest and the best.  It seems obvious that UCLA &amp; UCB will be  the first slated to adopt a differential campus fee increase should this  recommendation come to fruition.  It&#8217;s important to factor in the cost  of living around these campuses.  My argument is that the cost of living  around our most selective campuses are <em><strong>already</strong></em> differentially higher.  With less formal articulation, I have to say  that parents will freak out if differential campus fees come to pass.</p>
</div>
<div>What are your thoughts?  Leave you comments below or on the UC Commission on the Future website:  <a href="http://ucfuture.universityofcalifornia.edu/feedback.html" target="_blank">http://ucfuture.universityofcalifornia.edu/feedback.html</a></div>
<div><!-- P { 	MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px } BODY { 	SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #3f52b8; SCROLLBAR-DARKSHADOW-COLOR: #fafafa; SCROLLBAR-BASE-COLOR: #f7f7f7; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #cecfce; SCROLLBAR-TRACK-COLOR: #fffbff } SPAN#misspelled { 	PADDING-BOTTOM: 1px; BACKGROUND: url(8.1.263.0/themes/base/squiggly.gif) repeat-x 50% bottom } --></p>
<div><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: x-small;"></p>
<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: tahoma; font-size: x-small;">Indy Hurt</span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: tahoma; font-size: x-small;">UCSB Department of Geography, PhD  Student</span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: tahoma; font-size: x-small;">Graduate Student Association Vice  President of Academic Affairs 2009/2010</span></div>
<p></span></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/04/uc-commission-on-the-future-funding-strategies-reviewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upcoming Events!</title>
		<link>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/04/upcoming-events/</link>
		<comments>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/04/upcoming-events/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GSAAcademic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ucsbgsa.org/?p=605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following events are being offered by the Women&#8217;s Center later this month and all graduate students are invited. Participate in these excellent opportunities to meet your fellow graduate students and obtain information, do a little writing, or whirl your hips around as wildly as you can! Knowledge in Action Non-Profit Panel Wednesday, April 28, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following events are being offered by the Women&#8217;s Center later this month and all graduate students are invited.</p>
<p>Participate in these excellent opportunities to meet your fellow graduate students and obtain information, do a little writing, or whirl your hips around as wildly as you can!</p>
<p><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>Knowledge in  Action</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Non-Profit  Panel</strong></p>
<p><strong>Wednesday, April 28, 5  pm</strong></p>
<p><strong>Multipurpose Room,  SRB</strong></p>
<p>Meet with local non-profit leaders and learn how to  transition into a non-profit career.  Our panelists will include  Elsa Granados, Executive Director of the Santa Barbara Rape Crisis Center; Anne  Kratz, Vice President for University Advancement &amp; Development at Fielding  Graduate University; and Marsha Bailey,Founder and CEO of Women’s Economic Ventures and  the Small Business Loan Fund of Santa Barbara. These non-profit leaders will  share brief narratives about their careers and then respond to questions from  the audience.</p>
<p><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>Knowledge in  Action</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>LeAnnE Howe</strong></p>
<p><strong>Want  to Write?</strong> Strategies for  Reviving Your Stories</p>
<p><strong>Thursday, April 29, 5 pm </strong></p>
<p><strong>Women</strong>’s Center Conference  Room</p>
<p>In this workshop we will revive memories, and [re]learn  how to let go and write!  Bring a small object that  once belonged to a family member, a pet, a friend—something you can carry in  your book bag or purse.  This workshop will  benefit writers of all experience levels and at all stages including those in  the middle of a project and those with just an idea. LeAnne Howe is an enrolled  citizen of the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, an author, poet, and  screenwriter.</p>
<p><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>Stay Centered</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Hoop Dancing</strong></p>
<p><strong>Thursday, April 29, 6  pm</strong></p>
<p><strong>Multipurpose Room,  SRB</strong></p>
<p>You are invited to join Sara Munro and step inside the  hoop, claim your space, and give it a spin. Remember your rhythm, the joy of  self-expression through your body, and your ability to play while you practice  this new generation form of fitness, dance and movement. Larger, easier-to-use  hoops will be provided for use during the workshop, and will also be available  for sale. All fitness levels are welcome.</p>
<div><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: x-small;"></p>
<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: tahoma; font-size: x-small;">Indy Hurt</span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: tahoma; font-size: x-small;">UCSB Department of Geography, PhD  Student</span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: tahoma; font-size: x-small;">Graduate Student Association Vice  President of Academic Affairs 2009/2010</span></div>
<p></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/04/upcoming-events/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLTC Grad Conference (May 21st)</title>
		<link>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/04/cltc-grad-conference-may-21st/</link>
		<comments>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/04/cltc-grad-conference-may-21st/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VPStudent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ucsbgsa.org/?p=603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CLTC 2010 Graduate Student Conference:  *Celebrity and Glamour* (Consortium for Literature, Theory and Culture) Friday, May 21st, 2010 University of California, Santa Barbara &#8220;Celebrity is the advantage of being known to people who we don&#8217;t know, and who don&#8217;t know us.&#8221; &#8212; Nicolas de Chamfort What does it mean to think about &#8216;celebrity&#8217; and &#8216;glamour&#8217; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CLTC 2010 Graduate Student Conference:  *Celebrity and Glamour*<br />
(Consortium for Literature, Theory and Culture)</p>
<p>Friday, May 21st, 2010<br />
University of California, Santa Barbara</p>
<p>&#8220;Celebrity is the advantage of being known to people who we don&#8217;t know, and who don&#8217;t know us.&#8221; &#8212; Nicolas de Chamfort</p>
<p>What does it mean to think about &#8216;celebrity&#8217; and &#8216;glamour&#8217; in the contemporary moment? What are the parameters of these two concepts? What is the relationship between celebrity and glamour? Is contemporary celebrity distinct from &#8216;celebrity&#8217; in previous historical moments and cultural contexts, ranging from ancient Greece to Renaissance Italy, from the Romantics to the Russian Revolution? Can we speak of political celebrity? Literary, artistic or intellectual celebrity? How do these concepts traverse political, national, economic, and cultural terrains in producing new configurations of desires and imaginaries? How are Western/American discourses and images of celebrity and glamour exported and circulated throughout the global media economy? How do non-Western audiences and culture-makers absorb and/or contest these memes from inside or outside of that same economy? With the huge worldwide user-base of YouTube, Twitter and other social networking and media sharing platforms, the economic travails of older media (publishing, Hollywood, etc.), the increasing ubiquity of &#8216;reality&#8217; television programming, the popularity of do-it-yourself celebrity gossip blogs, and do-it-yourself viral video stardom, we seem to have reached a moment in which obscurity and celebrity are unstable notions whose dynamic relationship demands further inquiry.Both celebrity and glamour&#8211;past and present&#8211;are in need of interrogation in relation to the ongoing discourses concerning representation, theory, networks, the body, gender, power, community and so on.</p>
<p>It is with this in mind that the Consortium for Literature, Theory and Culture at the University of California, Santa Barbara has chosen *Celebrity and Glamour* as the themes of this year&#8217;s CLTC conference, which seeks interventions from graduate student scholars around California that consider these notions in historical, literary, cultural, or aesthetic terms.</p>
<p>The conference will be held at the UCSB Centennial House on May 21st, 2010.<br />
Keynote speakers to be announced shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/04/cltc-grad-conference-may-21st/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More GSHIP Updates</title>
		<link>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/04/gship-update/</link>
		<comments>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/04/gship-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VPStudent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ucsbgsa.org/?p=586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following are the 2010-11 menu items for the campus-wide GSHIP plan. We&#8217;ll be voting on them during our May 4th Assembly meeting. Please note that this plan will only go through for 2010-11 if UCSB does not sign onto the UC system-wide plan! Chancellor Yang will make that decision by April 30th. If you&#8217;re a graduate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following are the 2010-11 menu items for the campus-wide GSHIP plan. We&#8217;ll be voting on them during our May 4th Assembly meeting. Please note that this plan will only go through for 2010-11 if UCSB does <strong>not </strong>sign onto the UC system-wide plan! Chancellor Yang will make that decision by April 30th.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a graduate student at UCSB, make sure to tell your department&#8217;s GSA rep(s) how you feel about the following options! Unfortunately, because these negotiations are in process, the insurance company does not permit Assembly to distribute the specific pricing for each menu item to the broader graduate student community.  Without giving specific figures, I can say that the package they are offering us this year is very attractive!</p>
<p><a href="http://ucsbgsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/10-11-UCSBG-GSA-VIEW1.pdf">UCSB campus-wide GSHIP menu items 2010-2011</a>: Click to download.</p>
<p>As always, email gship@gsa.ucsb.edu with any questions or concerns about GSHIP or the voting process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/04/gship-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GSHIP Updates</title>
		<link>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/02/gship-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/02/gship-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VPStudent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minutes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ucsbgsa.org/?p=500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The campus GSHIP committee met on February 26th.  The discussion centered on two main issues: 1) campus-wide negotiations for the 2010-11 year and 2) the progress toward a system-wide GSHIP plan, which would eventually cover graduate students at all UCs.  At present, the GSA and the GSHIP committee are moving forward with the usual campus-wide [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The campus GSHIP committee met on February 26th.  The discussion centered on two main issues: 1) campus-wide negotiations for the 2010-11 year and 2) the progress toward a system-wide GSHIP plan, which would eventually cover graduate students at all UCs.  At present, the GSA and the GSHIP committee are moving forward with the usual campus-wide negotiations as a backup in case the system-wide plan does not go through for the 2010-11 year.  <strong>If a system-wide GSHIP does pass, and UCSB opts into it for the 2010-11 year, the campus-wide negotiations will be moot</strong>.   In the following minutes, I&#8217;ve divided my notes into &#8220;system-wide&#8221; and &#8220;campus-wide&#8221; sections to clarify the different movements on each front.</p>
</div>
<div>Note that in the campus-wide section, there is a list of proposed menu items (benefits that may be added for the 2010-11 year).  The GSA will ultimately vote on these items during our spring quarter Assembly meetings, once we have the cost projections from the underwriter.   While the menu items are public, the cost projections are confidential because they involve current negotiations.  <strong>If there is a menu item that you would like to see here, or you have questions about the following minutes, email gship@gsa.ucsb.edu.  If you have an opinion on how your department&#8217;s representative(s) should vote on any of the proposed items, please share it with that person(s)!<br />
</strong></p>
</div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong>GSHIP Committee Meeting</strong></h2>
<p style="text-align: center;">February 26, 2010</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">SYSTEM-WIDE</span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> UPDATE</span></strong></p>
<div>- the system-wide GSHIP committee has their next meeting March 3</div>
<div>- on March 11 and 12, representatives from seven campuses (graduate students and administrative staff) will travel to Sacramento to hear presentations from the three finalist insurers &#8211; UCOP will make a decision as to which insurer after this meeting</div>
<div>- bid details are confidential</div>
<div>- involves 7 of 11 campuses</div>
<div>- the new plan should be fully formed by this summer; would involve a small-opt out clause if it turns out to be too expensive or too difficult to implement</div>
<div>- if accepted, would take effect August 1 (for our campus, the beginning of the plan year &#8211; I believe some time in September)</div>
<div>- there are questions around what will happen to the dental discount plan</div>
<div>- Assembly will <strong>not </strong>be able to vote on whether or not to go to system-wide; Chancellor Yang decides</div>
<div>- however, students at campuses like UCLA have been concerned enough to draft a petition which they then gave to their Chancellor, who voted no for the 2010-2011 school year &#8211; that may be a potential avenue for UCSB GSA</div>
<div>- <strong>HUGE QUESTION:</strong> how will the graduate student voice be represented in a system-wide arena?  We don&#8217;t yet know what the process will be.  Will there be representatives from each campus?  How will those representatives be chosen, etc.?</div>
<div>- Dr. Elizabeth Downing warns that though the overall cost of GSHIP is likely to decrease under a system-wide plan, we may see bigger co-pays if the new plan somehow leads to an increase in administrative costs for Student Health on our campus &#8211; in other words, costs may be passed onto grads.</p>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">DRAFT MENU ITEMS FOR </span></strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>CAMPUS-WIDE</strong> </span><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">NEGOTIATIONS</span></strong></div>
<div>- we went over the menu items that we are going to submit to the underwriter, who will then determine how much each item would cost:</div>
<p>1. Increase Inpatient Alcohol and Drug Detoxification benefit from 3 days per plan year to:</p>
<div>a. 5 days per plan year</div>
<div>b. 10 days per plan year</div>
<div>***Note: this is detox, not hospitalization &#8211; the latter is coded differently (as a mental health issue)</div>
<p>2. Amend Outpatient Emergency Care copay from $100 to:</p>
<div>a. $75</div>
<div>b. $50</div>
<div>c. waive this altogether if Student Health is closed</div>
<div>***Note: this copay is always waived if you are admitted to the hospital</div>
<div>***Note: As is, if students are re-directed to an ER when Student Health <em>is</em> open simply because Student Health isn&#8217;t equipped to handle the problem, they still have to pay the copay.   Should we address this issue?</div>
<p>3. Amend Plan Year Maximum of $300,000 per condition to:</p>
<div>a. $400,000 per condition</div>
<div>b. $500,000 per condition</div>
<p>4. Amend Prescription Drug benefit maximum from $8,000 to:</p>
<div>a. $10,000</div>
<p>5. Parity for all Mental Health conditions.</p>
<div>***Note: Federal regulations regarding parity status for all mental health conditions are in flux.  A new federal regulation stipulated that there must be parity for all mental health conditions, but many states have claimed that it is a states&#8217; rights issue and that only states have the authority to set such regulations.  California has interpreted</div>
<div>this as only applying to employer/employee plans, but not to student health blanket policies, of which GSHIP is a part. However, mental health parity will <span style="text-decoration: underline;">probably</span> pass in the near future (though at present there is no legal requirement).  GSA may want to look into adding parity status for all mental health conditions anyway just because it&#8217;s a good benefit.  Renaissance (the insurance company) is currently compiling an experience report on mental health and should be able to tell us the cost of adding parity status soon.</div>
<p>6. Prorate international student early start date of 7/31 for 4 week summer intensive program.</p>
<p>7. Provide Student Health Services reciprocity benefits.</p>
<div>a. How much would it cost to treat other UC Student Health Centers as network providers?</div>
<div>(That would mean insurance would pay at 80% as opposed to 60%).</div>
<div>b. Because so few students visit other UC Student Health centers as is (about 10 per</div>
<div>year) this would likely not be an expensive item to add.</div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong><br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> STATEMENT OF RECIPROCAL SERVICES: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA STUDENT HEALTH CENTERS</span></strong></div>
<p>Elizabeth Downing consulted with directors from the other Student Health Centers to clarify the issue of reciprocity, and they drafted the following language.  This statement will be posted to the websites of the Student Health Center at our campus and presumably at the other UCs:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Student Health Center (SHC) at each University of California campus gladly offers reciprocal access to SHC services to currently registered studetns from all other UC campuses under the same conditions that apply to its own students who are not enrolled in its campus Student Health Insurance Plan (SHIP).  Students enrolled in their campus SHIP may receive special discounts, benefits or services at their home campus Student Health Center.  These special, campus-funded arrangements will not apply at another UC campus.&#8221;</p>
<p>Note:</p>
<div>- presently, fewer than 10 students per year take advantage of reciprocal services</div>
<div>- <strong>deductibles still apply; </strong>but here&#8217;s a potential scenario: If a UCLA grad was coming to UCSB&#8217;s Student Health Center and had not yet met her deductible, she would only have to pay <span style="text-decoration: underline;">our</span> student health fee ($50) which is likely less than the total deductible.  Note that other campuses may charge more for a doctor&#8217;s visit.</div>
<div>- upshot: this won&#8217;t be free; as is, you could go anywhere when you&#8217;re more than 50 miles away from your campus, but it might be a cost-saving measure to try to direct students to UC Student Health centers because of the extensive measures that they take to keep their admin costs down</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ucsbgsa.org/2010/02/gship-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
